Last week, the Louisiana Tax Commission issued an advisory confirming that the April 1 deadline for filing personal property tax forms with parish assessors was extended until April 13 pursuant to Governor John Bel Edward’s recent Executive Order. Separately, Orleans Parish Assessor Errol Williams extended the Orleans Parish deadline for filing property tax forms until May 1.
CARES Act Offers Much Needed Hope to Small Businesses
Keenly aware of the enormous impact COVID-19 is having on small businesses throughout the country, in response, the Congress approved and on March 27, 2020, the President signed the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act” (the “CARES Act”). The CARES Act is intended, in part, to provide small businesses some much needed relief in dealing with significant revenue shortages and the incentive to maintain existing workforces so as not to further compound the economic impact on American workers. The CARES Act appropriates $349 billion to small businesses, some of which will be available through amendments to the business loan provisions contained in section 7(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 636 (the “SB Act”).
Under the proposed “Paycheck protection program” (the “PPP”), the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) is authorized to provide, directly or through certain authorized lenders, a 100% federally-guaranteed loan, up to a defined maximum amount, to pay certain operational costs for the period from February 15, 2020 to June 30, 2020 (the “4.5 Month Covered Period”). Depending upon use of the funds and subject to certain other conditions, the proceeds of a PPP loan may be forgivable in whole or in part. The SBA administrator (the “Administrator”) may guarantee PPP loans under the same terms, conditions, and process as a loan made under Section 7(a) of the existing SB Act.
With the legislation exceeding 850-pages, many small businesses are turning to professionals, including their lawyers and lenders, for answers as to what the PPP, in particular, means for them. The below list includes most of the questions we have received to date. If you have any particular questions, we are here to answer them. Please direct your questions to one of our CARES Act Team Members listed below.
- Is My Business eligible for a PPP loan?
- Who are my employees?
- When Does SBA Determine the Size of My Business?
- How Do I Compute the Size of My Business?
- What Affiliation Rules Apply to Calculating the Size of My Business?
- Waiver of Affiliation Rules: Is there any special help for the hospitality and food industries or franchises?
- What is the Maximum Loan Amount available under this program?
- How May My Business Use the Proceeds of a PPP Loan?
- What is the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount?
- How is the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount reduced if the number of Employees has been reduced post-disaster?
- How is the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount reduced if the salaries and wages of Employees have been reduced post-disaster?
- What if the Employer has terminated employees or reduced compensation post-disaster but rehired employees and increased compensation prior to June 30, 2020?
- How Do I apply?
- What are the terms of the loan (initial deferment, repayment term, interest rate, collateral, personal guaranty, bank fees)?
- What if I already applied for or have an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL)?
- Are there Other Notable Provisions of the CARES Act that I Should Know?
******************************
- Is My Business A Small Business eligible for a PPP loan? Many businesses will be eligible without any need for a detailed understanding of the process. If your business has less than 500 employees no matter how you count them, then your business will in all likelihood be eligible. It is those businesses with more than 500 employees directly or with multiple affiliates each with their own payroll base that if aggregated would exceed 500 employees that need to review the following questions in this section very carefully.
- Small Business Concerns.
- “Small business concerns” eligible for loans under the existing provisions of the SB Act will be eligible for a PPP loan under the CARES Act. Under current law, a business concern may include individual, proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, joint venture (so long as there is no more than 49% participation by a foreign business entities), association, trust, or cooperative. To be a business concern eligible for SBA assistance as a small business, the concern must (i) be organized for profit, (ii) have a place of business located in the U.S., and (iii) operate primarily within the U.S. or make a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor.
- The SB Act provides that a concern is deemed small (i) if it is independently owned and operated, and (ii) so long as it is not dominant in its field of operation. The Administrator is authorized to provide additional criteria as to what will constitute a “small” business and, in so doing, may “utilize number of employees, dollar volume of business, net worth, net income, a combination thereof, or other appropriate factors.” In line with its authority, the Administrator has provided additional criteria in the form of size standards made on an industry-by-industry basis under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). These size standards are published by the SBA and are available here. (the “SBA Size Standards”).
- Expanded Scope of Eligibility.
- In addition to small business concerns eligible under the existing provisions of the SB Act, under the proposed amendments to the SB Act provided for in the CARES Act, the following additional business concerns may be eligible to receive a PPP loan:
- any business concern;
- 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organizations (excluding those that receive Medicaid reimbursements);
- 501(c)(19) veterans’ organizations; or
- Tribal business concern described in Section 31(b)(2)(C) of the SB Act
- To be eligible, the above-listed business concerns may not employ more than the greater of (i) 500 employees; or (ii) if applicable, the size standard in number of employees established by the Administration for the industry in which the entity operates as set out in the SBA Size Standards. Sole proprietorships, independent contractors, and certain eligible self-employed individuals (as such term is defined in section 7002(b) of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (Public Law 116-127) may also apply for a PPP loan.
- For the PPP program in particular, the proposed legislation waives the usual requirement that a business be organized for profit in order to be eligible for SBA assistance as a small business. The legislation is, however, silent as to any waiver of the remaining requirements contained in 13 CFR § 121.105(a) that require a business concern to have a place of business located in the U.S. and operate primarily within the U.S. or make a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor. It is reasonable to conclude that the Act’s silence suggests these requirements remain intact.
- What does this ultimately mean for my business? If your business has 500 or fewer employees, has a physical business located in the U.S. and is a U.S. taxpayer, your business is eligible for a PPP loan. Many businesses which are not eligible for small business loans under existing law will be eligible for a PPP loan. Non-profits, usually not eligible for small business loans, may also qualify. As to the foregoing, affiliation rules (discussed below) may still apply. Businesses with greater than 500 employees and businesses for which the SBA Size Standards are stated in terms of annual receipts (without regard for the number of employee), may be eligible for a PPP loan if they qualify as a “small business concern” under existing law. In order to determine if your business so qualifies, you should consult the SBA Size Standards.
- In addition to small business concerns eligible under the existing provisions of the SB Act, under the proposed amendments to the SB Act provided for in the CARES Act, the following additional business concerns may be eligible to receive a PPP loan:
- Who are my employees?
- The CARES Act makes clear that, for purpose of calculating the number of employees, the term “employee” shall include individuals on the payroll, whether full-time, part-time or on some other basis. According to existing law, “other basis” includes those individuals obtained from a temporary employee agency, professional employee organization or leasing concern.” Volunteers are not considered employees, though applicants should be mindful that individuals receiving in-kind compensation for work performed are not considered volunteers but, rather, employees for purposes of size.
- The applicant business should be mindful of existing affiliation rules (explained generally below) under the SB Act in calculating its number of employees.
- When Does SBA (or Lender) Determine the Size of My Business?
- Existing regulations regarding the SB Act, particularly 13 CFR §121.302, provide for the date on which size is determined. The CARES Act, in its present form, appears void of any language amending these existing rules. Currently, the SB Act provides that the SBA will determine the size status of an applicant for SBA financial assistance as follows:
- generally, as of the date the application for financial assistance is accepted for processing by SBA;
- in the case of applications under the Preferred Lenders Program (PLP), the SBA Express Loan Program (SBA Express), and the Export Express Loan Program (Export Express), as of the date of approval of the loan by the Lender; and
- in the case of applications, the Disaster Loan Program, as of the date the disaster commenced, as set forth in the Disaster Declaration.
- The CARES Act does not expressly address within which above category the Senate intends a PPP loan application to fall. It may be that the Senate intends to follow the general rule such that size will be determined as of the date the SBA accepts (directly or through a lender) the PPP application for processing. Alternatively, the language of the CARES Act may be read to imply that the Senate intends for PPP applications to be submitted, at least initially, through lenders, which might suggest the Senate intends that the rule applicable to the PLP, the SBA Express, and the Export Express should apply by analogy. Assuming that to be the case, the date of size determination would be the date on which the lender approves the PPP loan.
- As the CARES Act is silent and the current provisions contained in the SB Act do not expressly include the PPP in any of the more specific date of size determination rules, we must conclude that the general rule applies. We are hopeful that additional guidance provided by the Administration, assuming the CARES Act passes, addresses the matter more squarely.
- What does this ultimately mean for my business? It may be that the date of size determination is not relevant for a lot of businesses, particularly those that fall well under 500 employees or well within the maximum employee count or annual receipts amount (if applicable) allowed to be eligible as a small business concern under the existing SB Act and related regulations. Those businesses which find themselves near a cutoff mark may be more sensitive to the date utilized by the SBA for calculation of employees or annual receipts (if applicable).
- Existing regulations regarding the SB Act, particularly 13 CFR §121.302, provide for the date on which size is determined. The CARES Act, in its present form, appears void of any language amending these existing rules. Currently, the SB Act provides that the SBA will determine the size status of an applicant for SBA financial assistance as follows:
- How Do I Compute the Size of My Business?
- The SBA Size Standards are expressed either in the number of employees or annual receipts. The number of employees or annual receipts set forth in the SBA Size Standards represents the maximum allowed for a business concern and its affiliates to be considered small.
- Calculation of employees. The SBA calculates employees as follows:
- Calculate the average number of employees based upon numbers of employees for each of the pay periods for the 12-calendar months preceding the loan application;
- If a concern is less than a year old, calculate the average number of employees based upon the number of employees for each of the pay periods during which it has been in business;
- If a concern acquires an affiliate (or has been acquired as an affiliate) during the applicable period of measurement or before the date on which it self-certified as small, the employees to be counted will include the employees of the acquired (or acquiring) concern; and
- Employees of a former affiliate are not included provided the affiliation ended before the date used for determining size.
- Calculation of Annual Receipts (if applicable): Businesses having greater than 500 employees but for which the SBA Size Standards are stated in terms of annual receipts (without regard for the number of employees), may be eligible for a PPP loan if they qualify as a “small business concern” under existing law. The SBA calculates annual receipts based on the following principles:
- “Receipts” generally includes all revenue in whatever form received and from whatever source. More particularly, receipts include total income (or gross income) plus cost of goods sold. A more detailed definition of “receipts” may be found in 13 CFR §121.104.
- As to business loans and the EIDLs under the SB Act:
- for concerns that have been in business for 3+ fiscal years, annual receipts means the total receipts of the concern over its most recently completed three fiscal years divided by three;
- for concerns that have been in business for less than 3 fiscal years, annual receipts means the total receipts for the period the concern has been in business divided by the number of weeks in business, multiplied by 52.
- If a concern acquires an affiliate (or has been acquired as an affiliate) during the applicable period of measurement or before the date on which it self-certified as small, the annual receipts will include the receipts of the acquired (or acquiring) concern; and
- Annual receipts of a former affiliate will not be included, provided the affiliation ended before the date used for determining size.
- Calculation of employees. The SBA calculates employees as follows:
- The SBA Size Standards are expressed either in the number of employees or annual receipts. The number of employees or annual receipts set forth in the SBA Size Standards represents the maximum allowed for a business concern and its affiliates to be considered small.
- What Affiliation Rules Apply to Calculating the Size of My Business?
-
- In calculating size (whether measured in employees or annual receipts as set forth for the particular industry in the SBA Size Standards), businesses interested in applying for any SBA loan, including a PPP loan, must take into account employees or receipts, as applicable, of not only the applicant business but also of its domestic and foreign affiliates. Applicant businesses should identify for their lenders and attorneys their respective NAICS code as a starting point.
- Currently, for new business loans and disaster loans under the SB Act, the Code of Federal Regulations provides, 28 CFR §121.301, that an applicant business must satisfy both of the following criteria:
- The size of the applicant alone (without affiliates) must not exceed the size standard designated for the industry in which the applicant is primarily engaged; and
- The size of the applicant combined with its affiliates must not exceed the size standard designated for either the primary industry of the applicant alone or the primary industry of the applicant and its affiliates, whichever is higher.
- The SBA will consider the totality of the circumstances and is authorized, by pertinent regulations, to “find affiliation even though no single factor is sufficient to constitute affiliation.” Current regulations explain, generally, affiliation as follows:
-
- Small Business Concerns.
concerns and entities are affiliates of each other when one controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both. It does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists.
-
-
-
- More specifically, the regulations cite to the following specific affiliation principles pertinent to all business loans under Section 7(a) of the SB Act, including the PPP if the CARES Act is passed:
- Affiliation based on ownership: a concern is an affiliate of an individual, concern, or entity that owns or has the power to control more than 50% of the concern’s voting equity;
- if no individual, concern, or entity is found to control, the SBA will deem the Board of Directors or President or CEO (or other officers, managing members, or partners who control the management of the concern) to be in control of the concern;
- a minority shareholder may be deemed to be in control if that individual or entity has the ability (under the concern’s organizing documents or other agreement) to prevent a quorum or otherwise block action by the board of directors or shareholders.
- Affiliation arising under stock options, convertible securities, and agreements to merge (including agreements in principle)– the SBA gives present effect to options, convertible securities, and agreements as though the rights granted have been exercised; no such present effect will be given if such rights are subject to conditions precedent which are incapable of fulfillment, speculative, conjectural, or unenforceable under state or Federal law or the exercise of such rights is extremely remote;
- Affiliation based on management– affiliation arises:
- where the CEO or President of the applicant concern (or other officers, managing members, or partners who control the management of the concern) also controls the management of one or more other concerns;
- where a single individual, concern, or entity that controls the Board of Directors or management of one concern also controls the Board of Directors or management of one or more other concerns;
- where a single individual, concern or entity controls the management of the applicant concern through a management agreement;
- Affiliation based on identity of interest– where there is an identity of interest between close relatives (defined to include a spouse, parent, child or sibling, or the spouse of any such person) “with identical or substantially identical business or economic interests”, the SBA may aggregate those interests for purposes of computing size of either concern.
- Affiliation based on franchise and license agreements – the limitations on franchisees as a result of franchise or license agreements with the franchisor are not usually considered as control for purposes of determining the franchisee’s affiliates provided the franchisee or licensee “has the right to profit from its efforts and bears the risk of loss commensurate with ownership.” In such cases, the SBA only considers the franchise or license agreements of the applicant concern. This particular affiliation rule is relaxed even more in the proposed language of the CARES Act as described below.
- Affiliation based on ownership: a concern is an affiliate of an individual, concern, or entity that owns or has the power to control more than 50% of the concern’s voting equity;
- More specifically, the regulations cite to the following specific affiliation principles pertinent to all business loans under Section 7(a) of the SB Act, including the PPP if the CARES Act is passed:
- Determining the concern’s size – the SBA counts the receipts, employees or the alternate size standard (if applicable) of the concern plus all of its domestic and foreign affiliates, regardless of whether the affiliates are organized for profit.
- Exceptions to affiliation –
- business concerns owned in whole or substantial part by Small Business Investment Companies (described in the Small Business Act of 1958) are not affiliates;
- for Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, Native Hawaiian Organizations, Community Development Corporations (CDCs) authorized by 42 USC §9805;
- What does this ultimately mean for my business? This affiliation criteria has not been waived across the board for PPP loans, though the criteria has been waived for those certain businesses delineated below. If your business (including non-profits) does not fall within one of the limited groups for which these rules have been waived, your computation of employees (or annual receipts, if applicable) must take into account your affiliates.
-
-
-
- Waiver of Affiliation Rules: Is there any special help for the hospitality and food industries or franchises?
- According to the SBA Size Standards, Sector 72 businesses (those which include “accommodation and food services”) are usually determined to be small businesses based on annual receipts alone. As such, and due to the affiliation rules described above, many Section 72 businesses may not qualify as small business concerns under the usual SB Act rules.
- The CARES Act broadens a Section 72 business’ opportunity to qualify as a small business for purposes of being eligible for a PPP loan. Particularly, for Sector 72 businesses that maintain more than one physical location, if it employs 500 or fewer employees per location, the business will be eligible for a PPP loan. Furthermore, the entity affiliation rules set out in 13 CFR 121.103 are waived for the 4.5 Month Covered Period for Sector 72 businesses. This means that, in calculating its number of employees, a Sector 72 business need not take into account its affiliates.
- The affiliation rules are also waived as to any franchise businesses with an SBA franchisor identifier code and any business that received financial assistance from a company licensed as a Small Business Investment Company under section 301 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. The affiliation rules otherwise remain applicable to all other small business concerns, nonprofit organizations and veterans’ organizations.
- Waiver of Affiliation Rules: Is there any special help for the hospitality and food industries or franchises?
- What is the maximum loan amount available?
- (a) To determine the Maximum Loan Amount, the applicants must look back over a specific period of time as set forth in the CARES Act. The statute is not very clear. In subsection (b)(i) below we indicate how we believe language is to be interpreted. In subsection (c) below, we provide some additional explanations and other possible interpretations.
- (b) The “Maximum Loan Amount” (capped at $10 million) is the lesser of:
- (i) 2.5 times average total monthly payroll costs (as defined below) incurred in (A) the one-year period before the loan is made or the four (4) month period from March 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019, or (B) for seasonal employers, as determined by the Administrator, the average monthly payroll costs for the 12 weeks beginning on February 15, 2019, or the four (4) month period from March 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019; PLUS (ii) the outstanding amount of a loan made under the SBA’s Disaster Loan Program between January 31, 2020 and the date on which such loan may be refinanced as part of this new program (for those that want to refinance their EIDL Loans as discussed below); OR
- Upon request, for businesses that were not in existence during the period from February 15, 2019 to June 30, 2019 –2.5 times the average total monthly payroll payments from January 1, 2020 to February 29, 2020; PLUS the outstanding amount of a loan made under the SBA’s Disaster Loan Program between January 31, 2020 and the date on which such loan may be refinanced as part of this new program; OR
- $10 million.
- (c) Some commentators have indicated that the reference to the four-month period from March 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019 only applies to seasonal employers. However, we think there is good argument that it applies to all applicants. Non-seasonal employers that were in business from February 15, 2019 to June 30, 2019, that have already laid off a number of employees might prefer to use the four-month period (3/1/19-6/30/19) to determine the average monthly payroll costs. The average monthly payroll costs for the one-year period prior to the date the loan is made might be skewed because payroll costs for the month(s) immediately prior to the date the loan is made would be less than normal reducing the Maximum Loan Amount. We expect additional guidance on this point.
- (d) For purposes of computing the Maximum Loan Amount (as well as for the permitted use of loan proceeds discussed more fully below), the term “payroll costs”:
“(I) means
(aa) the sum of payments of any compensation with respect to employees that is a – (AA) salary, wage, commission, or similar compensation, (BB) payment of cash tip or equivalent, (CC) payment for vacation, parental, family medical, or sick leave, (DD) allowance for dismissal or separation, (EE) payment required for the provisions of group health care benefits, including insurance premiums, (FF) payment of any retirement benefit, or (GG) payment of State or local tax assessed on the compensation of employees; and
(bb) the sum of payments of any compensation to or income of a sole proprietor or independent contractor that is a wage, commission, income, net earnings from self-employment, or similar compensation and that is in an amount that is not more than $100,000 in 1 year, as prorated for the [4.5 Month Covered Period]; and
(II) shall not include –
(aa) the compensation of an individual employee in excess of an annual salary of $100,000, as prorated for the [4.5 Month Covered Period];
(bb) taxes imposed or withheld under Chapter 21, 22, 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 during the 4.5 Month Covered Period;
(cc) any compensation of employees whose principal place of residence is outside of the United States;
(dd) qualified sick leave wages for which a credit is allowed under section 7001 of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (Public Law 116-127); or
(ee) qualified family leave wages for which credit is allowed under section 7003 of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (Public Law 116-127).
- How May My Business Use the Proceeds of a PPP Loan?
- Proceeds of a PPP Loan may be used by an eligible recipient to cover (the “Permitted Uses”) (i) payroll costs (presumably having the same meaning as defined above), (ii) costs related to the continuation of group health care benefits during periods of paid sick, medical or family leave, and insurance premiums; (iii) employee salaries, commissions, or similar compensations (it is interesting to note that there is no reference here to excluding portions of compensation above $100,000 per year); (iv) payments of interest on mortgage obligations (not principal); (v) rent (including rent under a lease agreement); (vi) utilities; and (vii) interest on any other debt obligations that were incurred before the 4.5 Month Covered Period.
- At present, there is no guidance on what “rent” may include but presumably it includes rent paid for land and buildings and may include rent paid for equipment, vehicles and other movable (tangible) property.
- What is the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount?
- (a) What is the “Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount”?
- (i) The Maximum Loan Amount is defined above. The Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount is determined by computing the sum of certain expenditures during the “covered period” which for these purposes is defined as the 8-week period beginning on the date of the origination of a covered loan (the “8-Week Covered Period”). The date of the origination of a covered loan is not defined but presumably it is the date the application for the covered loan is made or the date the covered loan is made which presumably should be very close in time for these types of loans. For some borrowers, it may make a difference when they apply for the loan so careful thought should be given to this aspect.
- (ii) The amount of the loan that is eligible for forgiveness is equal to the sum of the following costs incurred and payments made during the 8-Week Covered Period. This language is somewhat troubling because it would seem to require the expenditure to be both incurred and paid during the same 8-week period. It is also troubling because the language defining the costs that are included sometimes include the word payment and sometimes do not. The eligible costs to be included are the following (“Eligible Expenditures”):
- (A) “Payroll costs” (as payroll costs are defined above, which excludes the portion of an employee’s compensation in excess of $100,000 per year, as prorated).
- (B) “Any payment of interest on any covered mortgage obligation (which shall not include any prepayment of or payment of principal on a covered mortgage obligation).” A “covered mortgage obligation” is defined as any indebtedness or debt instrument incurred in the ordinary course of business that is a liability of the borrower, is a mortgage on real or personal property, and was incurred before February 15, 2020.
- (C) “Any payment on any covered rent obligation.” A “covered rent obligation” is defined as rent obligated under a leasing agreement in force before February 15, 2020.
- (D) “Any covered utility payment.” A “covered utility payment” means payment for service for the distribution of electricity, gas, water, transportation, telephone, or internet access for which service began before February 15, 2020.
- (iii) We suspect that Congress wanted to make sure that the Eligible Expenditures were actually paid before forgiving the loan amount. We also suspect that Congress wanted to measure the expenses incurred during the 8-Week Covered Period. However, the language is far from clear. What if you paid four months of rent during the 8-Week Covered Period?
- (b) How is the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount reduced if the number of Employees has been reduced post-disaster (the “Reduction in Force Reduction”)?
- (i) The sum of the Eligible Expenditures during the 8-Week Covered Period (however measured appropriately) is referred to as the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount.
- (ii) The Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount may be reduced because it must be multiplied by a fraction that penalizes employers for reducing headcount on a FTEE basis.
- (A) The numerator of the fraction is the average number of full-time equivalent employees (FTEEs) per month – calculated by the average number of FTEEs for each pay period falling within a month – during the 8-Week Covered Period.
- (B) The denominator of the fraction is either (at the election of the borrower):
- (1) Average number of FTEEs per month employed from February 15, 2019 to June 30, 2019; or
- (2) Average number of FTEEs per month employed from January 1, 2020 until February 29, 2020;
- (3) Or, for seasonal employers – the average number of FTEEs per month employed from February 15, 2019 until June 30, 2019.
- (iii) The CARES Act does not define a full-time equivalent employee. The Affordable Care Act defines a full-time employee as one that works 30 hours per week or 120 hours per month. That is probably the best we have to go on at this time. The same definition will apply in the numerator and the denominator.
- (iv) This would probably mean that any employee that works on average more than 30 hours per week would be treated as one FTEE whether that employee averages 32 hours per week or 40 hours per week. Employees that work less than 30 hours per week would be treated as a partial FTEE.
- (c) How is the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount reduced if the salaries and wages of employees have been reduced post-disaster (“Reduction in Wages Reduction”)?
- (i) The Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount shall be reduced by the amount of any reduction in total salary or wages of any “employee” during the 8-Week Covered Period that is in excess of 25% of the total salary or wages of the employee during the most recent full quarter during which the employee was employed before the 8-Week Covered Period.
- (ii) Employee, for this purpose, is limited to any employee who did not receive during any single pay period during 2019 a salary or wages at an annualized rate of pay over $100,000.
- (iii) An eligible recipient with tipped employees may receive forgiveness for additional wages paid to those employees.
- (d) What if the Employer has terminated employees or reduced compensation post-disaster but rehired employees and increased compensation prior to June 30, 2020?
- (i) The Reduction in Force Reduction and the Reduction in Wages Reduction are ignored in the following circumstances. The amount of loan forgiveness shall be determined without regard to a reduction in the number of full-time equivalent employees of an eligible recipient or a reduction in the salary of one or more employees of the eligible recipient, as applicable, during the period beginning on February 15, 2020 and ending on approximately April 26, 2020 (the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of the CARES Act), if
- (A) with respect to the reduction in force, the borrower eliminates the reduction in force not later than June 30, 2020; and
- (B) with respect to the reduction in wages, the borrower eliminates the reduction in wages not later than June 30, 2020.
- (ii) This seems to open up the possibility for much gamesmanship by the borrowers in that borrowers might rehire a number of employees and even raise wages on June 15, 2020, and then reverse the hires and the increase in wages at some point not too long after June 30, 2020.
- (iii) The Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount would presumably still be based on the actual Eligible Expenditures during the 8-Week Covered Period. That is, as a result of terminating employees, the payroll costs in the 8-Week Covered Period will be less than they would have been had the employees not been terminated. We do not believe that rehiring employees or increasing salaries after the 8-Week Covered Period results in a deemed increase in Eligible Expenditures during the 8-Week Covered Period.
- (iv) Further, it is not clear whether the reversal referenced above in subsection (d)(i) requires a total reversal in the reduction in force and a total reversal in the reduction in wages to get the benefit of this provision. In other words, if the Reduction in Force Reduction would have been based on a fraction of 12/20 because the eligible recipient terminated 8 of the 20 full-time employees but prior to June 30, 2020, rehired 4, would the fraction become 16/20, or would the fraction remain 12/20 because the eligible recipient did not totally reverse the reduction in force. The language is not clear.
- (v) Hopefully, the SBA will issue regulations to add clarity to this provision.
- (i) The Reduction in Force Reduction and the Reduction in Wages Reduction are ignored in the following circumstances. The amount of loan forgiveness shall be determined without regard to a reduction in the number of full-time equivalent employees of an eligible recipient or a reduction in the salary of one or more employees of the eligible recipient, as applicable, during the period beginning on February 15, 2020 and ending on approximately April 26, 2020 (the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of the CARES Act), if
- (e) All of the discussion in this Section 4 related to the forgiveness of PPP Loans is found in Section 1106 of the CARES Act. Section 1106 defines “covered period” as the eight week period immediately following the loan origination (what we refer to as the 8-Week Covered Period). Section 1102 of the Cares Act used to determine the Maximum Loan Amount defines the covered period as the period from 2/15/20 to 6/30/20 (what we refer to as the 4.5 Month Covered Period). Using the 8-Week Covered Period makes sense when determining the amount of Eligible Expenditures by the eligible recipient which is used to determine the Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount. When analyzing the numerator in the fraction used to determine the Reduction in Force Reduction and when evaluating reductions in wages in the Reduction in Wages Reduction, the reference to “covered period” as being this eight week period as opposed to the 4.5 month period seems illogical. In a way, it incentivizes employers to terminate their employees and/or reduce wages now and then rehire the terminated employees and increase the wages when the loan is originated which might not be until May. Further evidence that this may not have been the intent of Congress is that the curative provisions described above in subsection (d) are rendered irrelevant for any loans originated after April 26, 2020. The curative language focuses on reductions in force and wages that occurred between February 15, 2020, and 30 days after the legislation was passed which should be approximately April 26, 2020. For loans originating after April 26, 2020, this curative language is irrelevant. It would not be irrelevant if the covered period referenced in the Reduction in Force Reduction and the Reduction in Wages Reduction was the 4.5 Month Covered Period. However, Section 1106 states that the term covered period means this eight week period so it is hard to read those references as meaning the 4.5 month period.
- (f) The eligible recipients seeking loans will be required to furnish:
- (i) documentation verifying the number of full-time equivalent employees on payroll and pay rate for the applicable periods including
- (A) payroll tax filings reported to the IRS; and
- (B) State income, payroll, and unemployment insurance filings;
- (ii) documentation, including canceled checks, payment receipts, transcripts of accounts, or other documents verifying payments on Eligible Expenditures;
- (iii) a certification from a representative of the eligible recipient authorized to make such certifications that:
- (A) the documentation presented is true and correct; and
- (B) the amount for which forgiveness is requested was used to retain employees and make Eligible Expenditures;
- (iv) and any other documentation required by the Administrator.
- (i) documentation verifying the number of full-time equivalent employees on payroll and pay rate for the applicable periods including
- (a) What is the “Maximum Loan Forgiveness Amount”?
- How Do I apply? What Information, Documentation or Collateral Must I Provide?
- Apply with Lenders. The CARES Act authorizes the SBA to make loans, directly or through qualifying lenders, under the PPP. Under the CARES Act, qualifying lenders are deemed to have authority of the Administrator to make and approve PPP loans for the Permitted Uses. In determining eligibility, the CARES Act specifically instructs lenders to determine, prior to approving a PPP loan, that the borrower (i) was in operation on February 15, 2020; and (ii) had employees for whom the applicant paid salaries and payroll taxes or paid independent contractors as reported on a Form 1099-MISC.
- Collateral and Documentation. The CARES Act is clear that no personal guarantee and no collateral shall be required for the PPP loan. The CARES Act is less clear as to what documentation it will require along with the application for a PPP loan.
- Documentation that Banks Might Require. At a minimum, applicants should be ready to provide to the SBA or their lenders documentation to evidence that the applicant was in operation on February 15, 2020 and that the applicant had employees for whom the applicant paid salaries and payroll taxes or paid independent contractors. Eligible self-employed individuals, independent contractors and sole proprietorships shall also submit “such documentation as is necessary to establish such individual as eligible” which such documentation may include payroll tax filings, Forms 1099-MISC, and income and expense statements from the sole proprietorship.
- Additional Regulations to be Promulgated. The Administrator is required to issue, within thirty (30) days following enactment of the CARES Act, regulations to provide further guidance to applicants and lenders on the process. Though lenders anticipate that the loan process will be more streamlined for the PPP than is the case for typical Section 7(a) loans, until the Administration issues further guidance, many lenders are circulating their standard SBA Form 1919 to aid applicants in gathering of documents and information for the application process. A copy of the current SBA Form 1919 may be downloaded here.
- Borrower Certifications. When applying for a PPP loan, borrowers will be required to make a good faith certification that:
- the uncertainty of current economic conditions “makes necessary the loan request to support the ongoing operations of the eligible recipient”;
- funds will be used to retain workers and maintain payroll or make mortgage payments, lease payments, and utility payments;
- the eligible recipient does not already have an application pending for a PPP loan that is for the same purpose and duplicative of amounts applied for or received under a PPP loan; and
- from February 15, 2020 until December 31, 2020, the eligible recipient has not received amounts under the PPP.
- Though an applicant for SBA financial assistance ordinarily must show that it is unable to obtain credit elsewhere before the SBA will make the business a loan, this alternate source of credit rule is waived under the CARES Act.
- What are the terms of the loan (Initial deferment, Repayment Term, Interest Rate, Collateral, Personal Guaranty, Bank Fees)?
- Loan repayment shall be deferred for at least six months and up to twelve months.
- If there is a remaining balance due under the PPP loan, it shall have a maximum maturity of 10 years from the date on which the borrower applies for loan forgiveness. It is not clear how the actual maturity date (i.e., 10 years or something shorter) will be determined. Presumably, the SBA will offer more guidance.
- Collateral and personal guarantee requirements are waived under this program.
- The maximum interest rate is 4% per annum.
- Borrowers may not be charged prepayment fees.
- The Administrator will have no recourse against any individual shareholder, member, or partner of an eligible recipient of a PPP loan for nonpayment of the PPP loan, except to the extent that such shareholder, member, or partner uses the covered loan proceeds for something other than a Permitted Use.
- Participating lenders are entitled to compensation (based on loan balance at time of disbursement) of:
- Five percent for loans of $350,000 or less;
- Three percent for loans above $350,000 and less than $2 million; and
- One percent for loans of $2 million and above.
- The SBA guarantee for that portion of the loan will remain intact.
- What if I already applied for or have an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL)?
- A recipient of an EIDL made during the period beginning on January 31, 2020 and ending on the date a PPP loan is made available can also obtain a PPP loan, as long as the EIDL loan is used for different purposes. An EIDL is not subject to forgiveness.
- EIDLs made in between January 31, 2020 and ending on the date on which a PPP loan is made available may be refinanced as part of the PPP loan. Any such refinancing will not increase the $10 million maximum amount allowed for the PPP loan as set forth above.
- The CARES Act makes the following additional changes to the SBA Disaster Loan program during the covered period for loans made in response to COVID-19:
- Waives rules related to personal guarantees on advances and loans of $200,000 or less for all applicants;
- Waives the “1 year in business prior to the disaster” requirement (except the business must have been in operation on January 31, 2020);
- Waives the requirement that an applicant be unable to find credit elsewhere; and
- Allows lenders to approve applicants based solely on credit scores (no tax return submission required) or “alternative appropriate methods to determine an applicant’s ability to repay.”
- Are there Other Notable Provisions of the CARES Act that I Should Know?
- There are significant tax provisions in the CARES Act. Click here for more information
- The Administrator will not collect under the PPP the fees otherwise permitted under paragraphs (18)(A) and (23)(A) of the SB Act.
- There are significant benefits for existing SBA loans.
- This section defines “covered loans” as loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administrator under:
- The SBA Business Loan Program, Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (including the Community Advantage Pilot Program, but excluding the new PPP loans); or
- Title V of the Small Business Investment Act; or
- Made by an intermediary to a small business concern using loans or grants received under the SBA’s Microloan Program.
- For these loans, the Administrator must pay (not just defer) (and relieve the borrower of any obligation to pay) the principal, interest, and any associated fees owed in a regular servicing status:
- For covered loans made before this bill is enacted not on deferment, for the six-month period beginning with the next payment due;
- For covered loans made before this bill is enacted that are on deferment, for the six-month period beginning with the next payment due after deferment; and
- For covered loans made within six months of enactment of this bill, for six months after the first payment is due.
- With respect to these loans, it is the Sense of the Congress that the Administration, in addition to the SBA relief already provided under the CARES Act, “should encourage lenders to provide payment deferments, when appropriate, and to extend the maturity of covered loans, so as to avoid balloon payments or any requirement for increases in debt payments resulting from deferments provided by lenders” during the COVID-19-declared emergency.
- This section defines “covered loans” as loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administrator under:
The SBA is expected to publish further guidance in the next week or two, and thus some of the foregoing may be modified or clarified further. If you have any questions about the PPP SBA Loan Program, including whether your business is eligible for such a loan, please do not hesitate to reach out to one of our CARES Act Team Members: Dean Cazenave (dean.cazenave@keanmiller.com, 225.382.3483), Blane Clark (blane.clark@keanmiller.com, 225.382.3414), Royce Lanning (royce.lanning@keanmiller.com, 832.494.1711), Matthew Meiners (matthew.meiners@keanmiller.com, 225.382.3416), Mark Miller (mark.miller@keanmiller.com, 318.562.2701) and Elisabeth Prescott (elisabeth.prescott@keanmiller.com, 225.389.3789).
Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Courts Pause – An Employer and/or Insurer’s Obligations Do Not
In the midst of the novel COVID-19 pandemic, businesses of all sectors have been impacted in some way. This includes the legal community as some courts have closed, deadlines have been postponed, legal professionals are working from home, and even new laws are being passed – please see Kean Miller’s Louisiana Law Blog for continued updates during the COVID-19 outbreak.
On March 26, 2020, the Louisiana Office of Workers’ Compensation Administration issued a notice closing all Workers’ Compensation Courts from March 26, 2020 through April 13, 2020. During this time, no in-person hearings or mediation conferences will be held and all previously scheduled hearing/conferences will be rescheduled after the courts reopen.
While Workers’ Compensation courts are closed, many claimants will continue their medical treatment and will rely on their indemnity benefits now more than ever. It is important that the employers and/or insurers continue to timely respond to requests for medical authorizations and continue the claimant’s indemnity payments. Failure to do so could result in an award of penalties and attorney’s fees.
In addition to the employer and/or insurer’s regular obligation to provide benefits, the Office of Workers’ Compensation issued an emergency ruling on March 23, 2020 that tweaks those obligations in favor of the claimant. The ruling primarily concerns the claimant’s ability to obtain prescription medication and receive medical treatment during this time as many medical facilities have shut down. In turn, the ruling addresses the timelines that employers and/or insurers must comply with in authorizing these treatments and/or prescription refills. Although these obligations are new, an employer and/or insurer should anticipate the failure to comply with these guidelines may result in the imposition of penalties and attorney’s fees.
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact Kean Miller attorneys, Forrest E. Guedry at 225.382.3464.
Tax and Accounting Implications of the $2 Trillion Stimulus to Assist Individuals and Businesses Impacted by the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic
On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed H.R. 748, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (Public Law No: 116-136, the “CARES Act” or the “Act”). The CARES Act makes significant changes to the taxation of individuals and businesses in the form of a number of relief provisions designed to mitigate the negative economic consequences of the novel coronavirus or “COVID-19” pandemic. The Act also makes technical corrections to prior relief legislation, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (PL 116–127, H.R. 6201), and corrects one of the most significant errors in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115-97, the “TCJA”). Due to the unusual speed of the legislative process, the CARES Act may contain technical issues or drafting errors that may have to be addressed in future legislation.
This blog post summarizes several of the most significant tax and accounting changes for businesses and individuals. A separate blog post containing a more detailed review of the employment tax and employee benefits changes is also forthcoming. The Kean Miller Tax Group will post additional updates as the situation develops.
In addition to the tax changes, the CARES Act contains provisions designed to provide relief to small businesses, large businesses, and changes designed to support the U.S. health care system. Additional guidance on these provisions is forthcoming. All of Kean Miller’s guidance related to the Coronavirus pandemic is located here.
Business Tax Changes
Section 1106 – Loan Forgiveness –The CARES Act permits the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) to make loans to certain small business under the Paycheck Protection Program, discussed in more detail here. Section 1106 of the Act provides a mechanism under which certain indebtedness related to these loans can be forgiven. Unless an exception applies, Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 61 requires a taxpayer to include cancellation of indebtedness income in its taxable income. Section 1106 creates an exception to IRC Section 61 and provides that loan forgiven under the Act shall be excluded from a taxpayer’s taxable income for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code. It should be noted that the Act is silent on whether a borrower’s tax attributes will be reduced under IRC Section 108 in the amount of the forgiven debt. Additional guidance may be necessary to clarify this issue.
Section 2205 – Modification of Limitations on Charitable Contributions for Businesses – The CARES Act amends IRC Section 170 to increase the cap on charitable contribution deductions for corporations for “qualified contributions” and provides for the carryover of any excess contributions. The Act defines “qualified contributions” as contributions of cash during the 2020 calendar year to charitable organizations other than most private foundations (other than certain private operating foundations and certain special types of private foundations), supporting organizations or donor advised funds and for which the taxpayer makes an election to have the new law apply. For partnerships and S Corporations, the election is made at the partner or shareholder level.
For corporations, the Act allows a corporation to deduct qualified contributions to the extent they do not exceed 25% (increased from 15%) of the corporation’s taxable income reduced by the amount of other charitable contributions allowed.
The Act increases the percentage limitation on contributions of food inventory from 15% to 25%. For any taxpayer other than a C corporation, the limit will be 25% of the taxpayer’s aggregate net income for such taxable year from all trades or businesses from which such contributions were made for such year. In the case of a C corporation, the limit will be 25% of the taxable income of the C corporation.
Section 2301 – Employee Retention Credit for Employers Subject to Closure Due to COVID-19 – The CARES Act provides an employee retention credit to employers, based on wages (and a proportionate amount of qualified health plan expenses) paid to employees. The credit is limited to 50% of wages paid after March 12, 2020 and before January 1, 2021 and cannot exceed $10,000 per employee. An eligible employer is a nongovernmental employer that carried on a trade or business during 2020 and that meets either of the following tests:
- Operation of the business was fully or partially suspended to due government orders limiting commerce, travel or group meetings due to COVID-19; or
- The business experienced a reduction in gross receipts (determined quarterly as compared with the prior year) of at least 50%, with the credit continuing until the gross receipts exceed 80% of prior year levels.
The credit applies to wages paid to employees by the employer, with respect to which the employee is not performing services (for an employer with over 100 employees in the prior year), to wages paid during the period of suspension (for employers with fewer than 100 employees and which are subject to suspension order), and to wages paid with respect to an employee in the calendar quarter during which the substantial reduction in gross receipts apply (for an employer with fewer than 100 employees and which had a 50% decline in gross receipts). Affiliated employers are considered a single employer for purposes of the 100 employee determination.
Self-employed persons may also claim the credit for their self-employment income. Wages credited under the Paid Sick Leave or Paid Family and Medical Leave provisions of the Families First Coronavirus Recovery Act are not included. Employers taking a small business interruption loan are not eligible for the credit. Tax exempt employers are eligible for the credit.
Wages credited under the Paid Sick Leave or Paid Family and Medical Leave provisions of the Families First Coronavirus Recovery Act are not included. Employers taking a small business interruption loan under the Paycheck Protection Program are not eligible for the credit. In addition, an employee for which the employer retention credit is taken is ineligible for purposes of the work opportunity tax credit in IRC Section 51.
The credit is claimed by the employer by reducing the employment taxes payable for all of its employees. If the credit exceeds the employment taxes, then the employer can claim a refund, which is payable by the Treasury Department under the refund rules for excess employment tax payments.
Section 2302 – Deferral of Payment of Employer Payroll Taxes – The Act also permits an employer to defer the payment of certain employer payroll taxes. Applicable payroll taxes include Social Security and Medicare as well as self-employment taxes. In the case of self-employment taxes only 50% of the self-employment taxes may be delayed. The payroll tax deferral period is the period from the date of enactment (March 27, 2020) to December 31, 2020. One-half of the taxes must be paid by December 31, 2021 and the remainder must be paid by December 31, 2022. The ability to defer payment of payroll taxes may not apply if the employer had indebtedness forgiven under the under the Paycheck Protection Program.
Section 2303 – Modifications for Net Operating Losses – The CARES Act makes two significant modifications to the net operating loss provisions in the Internal Revenue Code. First, the Act amends IRC Section 172(a) to temporarily repeal the taxable income limitation on the deduction for net operating losses. Second, the Act permits a 5-year carryback for net operating losses arising in a tax year beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2021.
Under prior law, a taxpayer’s net operating loss deduction was limited to the lesser of an amount equal to the aggregate of the net operating loss carryovers to such year, plus the net operating loss carrybacks to such year or 80% of the taxpayer’s taxable income. The CARES Act suspends the 80% limitation for tax years beginning before January 1, 2021.
Under prior law, a net operating loss arising in a tax year ending after Dec. 31, 2017 could be carried forward indefinitely, but could not be carried back. (Note that, under prior law, a net operating loss that arose in a tax year ending before January 1,2018, could be carried back two years and carried forward 20 years). The CARES Act permits a 5-year carryback for net operating losses arising in a tax year beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2021. This change is important because it could permit a taxpayer to carry net operating losses back to years before 2017, when the tax rate was 35%.
The CARES Act also makes some additional modifications and technical corrections to the tax laws related to net operating losses. The Act provides that the new 5-year carryback rule cannot be used to offset IRC Section 965 transition tax income. In addition, it contains an important technical correction to the TCJA that clarifies how a fiscal year filer should report a net operating loss for a tax year that includes December 31, 2017. Under the TCJA, it appeared that a taxpayer with a fiscal year that included December 31, 2017 was subject to the net operating loss carryback disallowance. The CARES Act corrects that language and clarifies that a taxpayer with a fiscal year that began before December 31, 2017 and ended after December 31, 2017 was permitted to carryback that year’s net operating loss.
The Act also provides that a net operating loss carryback claim for the 2018 tax year and certain fiscal years or short years will be considered timely filed if it is filed no later than 120 days after the enactment of the Act.
The net operating loss modifications may provide a refund opportunity for a taxpayer that incurred a net operating loss in its 2018 or 2019 tax years. It should also be noted that any taxpayer subject to the global intangible low-taxed income regime under the TCJA should carefully consider how carrying back net operating losses will impact their deduction under IRC Section 250. In addition, a taxpayer should consider the impact of carrying back net operating losses on its previously claimed foreign tax credits.
Section 2304 – Modification of Limitation on Losses for Taxpayers Other Than Corporations – The CARES Act temporarily repeals IRC Section 461(l), which prevented a non-corporate taxpayer (e.g., a partnership or sole proprietor) from deducting excess losses for a tax year beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. Under the CARES Act, IRC Section 461(l) is effectively repealed for tax years beginning before December 31, 2020. The excess loss modifications may provide a refund opportunity for a taxpayer that incurred an excess loss in its 2018 or 2019 tax years.
By delaying the implementation of IRC Section 461(l) it appears the CARES Act permits a taxpayer other than a corporation, including a sole proprietor or non-corporate partner in a partnership, to elect to carry back net operating losses related to tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before December 31, 2020 for five years. Thus, depending on the taxpayer’s specific facts and circumstances, a taxpayer could use those net operating losses to offset tax previously paid when the top marginal tax rate was 39%. Additional bonus depreciation related to the technical correction made to fix the “retail glitch” (discussed below) could enhance the potential benefit of carrying back these net operating losses.
Section 2305 – Modification of Credit for Prior Year Minimum Tax Liability of Corporations – The CARES Act amends IRC Section 53 to accelerate the payment of alternative minimum tax credit refunds to corporate taxpayers.
Section 2306 – Modification of Limitation on Business Interest – The CARES Act amends IRC Section 163(j) to permit a taxpayer to elect to reduce the limitation on business interest deductions from 30% of a taxpayer’s adjusted taxable income to 50% of a taxpayer’s adjusted taxable income for any taxable year beginning in 2019 or 2020. In addition, for any tax year beginning in 2020, a taxpayer may elect to compute the limitation on business interest deductions based on their 2019 adjusted taxable income.
In addition, a partner in a partnership that is subject to the business interest expense limitation can treat 50% of an excess business interest expense allocated to the partner during 2019 as fully deductible in the 2020 tax year. The remaining 50% of the excess business interest expense would be subject to the rules under IRC Section 163(j) and as such is only deductible in a future year if the partner has excess taxable income or excess business interest income passed-through to the partner.
It should be noted that it is not clear whether the Treasury Department will issue guidance permitting certain real estate businesses that previously elected out of limitations on business interest deductions due to qualified improvement property being ineligible for bonus depreciation under IRC Section 168 (see below) to revoke their election.
Section 2307 – Technical Amendment Regarding Qualified Improvement Property – The CARES Act contains a technical correction to one of the most problematic sections of the TCJA, known as the “retail glitch”. The TCJA’s legislative history indicated that the drafters intended to make property classified as qualified leasehold improvement property, qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvement property eligible for 100% bonus depreciation under IRC Section 168. To accomplish this goal, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the TCJA eliminated the 15-year MACRS property classification for that property and replaced it with single new classification, qualified improvement property. The retail glitch occurred because instead of assigning a cost recovery period of 20 years or less to the qualified improvement property, the TCJA assigned a 39-year cost recovery period, thereby making qualified improvement property ineligible for bonus depreciation.
The CARES Act corrects the retail glitch by amending IRC Section 168 and assigning a 20-year cost-recovery period to qualified improvement property. The amendment to IRC Section 168 is retroactive to the effective date of the relevant section of the TCJA, thereby creating a potential refund opportunity for certain taxpayers.
Employee Benefits Changes
As noted above, a separate blog post containing a more detailed review of the employment tax and employee benefits changes is forthcoming. Some of the more significant employment tax and employee benefits provisions are summarized below.
Section 2202 – Special Rules for Use of Retirement Funds – The CARES Act waives the ten percent early withdrawal penalty of IRC Section 72(t) for certain coronavirus related withdrawals of up to $100,000 from retirement plans and Individual Retirement Accounts. Any such withdrawals will be deemed to meet the permissible distribution requirements of IRC Section 401(k) as a hardship distribution and therefore are exempt from withholding and the trustee to trustee transfer rules. Further, any amounts withdrawn may be repaid to a qualified plan, an individual retirement account (“IRA”), or rollover-eligible vehicle at any time over a three-year period commencing on the date the distribution was received and do not have to be paid all at once. Withdrawals may be made by an individual who has been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 as a result of taking a test approved by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), a spouse or dependent who has been diagnosed by such a test, or even by an individual who has experienced adverse financial consequences as a result of being quarantined, furloughed, laid off, a reduction in working hours, or the inability to work for lack of child care. A retirement plan administrator may rely on a certification of qualification provided by the plan participant. If the recipient is unable to repay amounts withdrawn, tax on the distribution may be paid ratably over the three taxable years beginning with the taxable year in which the distribution was received.
In addition to liberalized withdrawal provisions, the CARES Act increases the dollar amount available for loans from qualified plans from $50,000 to $100,000 and also increases the percentage limitation on available loans from 50% to 100% of the present value of the plan participant’s benefit and provides other favorable provisions to facilitate taking loans from one’s retirement plan.
Sections 2203 – Temporary Waiver of Required Minimum Distribution Rules For Certain Retirement Plans and Accounts – The CARES Act provides for a one-year delay in the required minimum distributions (“RMDs”) otherwise due April 1, 2020, and other 2020 RMDs for defined contribution plans under IRC Sections 401(a), 403(a) and (b), as well as IRAs, and IRC Section 457 plans, but not defined benefit plans. The Act also provides for a special rollover rule for certain amounts subject to the RMD rules.
Section 3607 – Expansion of Department of Labor Authority to Postpone Certain Deadlines – The Act provides for extension of the date for making certain plan amendments and delays certain minimum funding contributions for qualified plans and gives the Secretary of Labor certain flexibility in extending deadlines as the result of the declaration of a “public health emergency” (which declaration was made on January 31st of this year).
Excise Tax Changes
Section 2308 – Temporary Exception From Excise Tax for Alcohol Used to Produce Hand Sanitizer – The CARES Act amends IRC Section 5214(a) to create an excise tax exemption for distilled spirits withdrawn from the bonded premises of any distilled spirits plant after December 31, 2019, and before January 1, 2021 for use in or contained in hand sanitizer produced and distributed in a manner consistent with any guidance issued by the Food and Drug Administration that is related the novel coronavirus pandemic. The amendment appears designed to ensure the nation’s distillers are able to produce hand sanitizer free of the alcohol excise tax.
“Distilled spirits” are, generally, ethyl alcohol, ethanol or spirits of wine in any form (including all dilutions and mixtures thereof from whatever source by whatever process produced). Liquor distillers pay a federal excise tax of up to $13.50 per proof gallon (of alcohol) on liquor and other products containing alcohol. Under the Act, distillers who have or will divert liquor-production operations to producing hand sanitizer will not be required to pay the federal excise tax generally imposed on the alcohol they use to produce liquor if the alcohol is used in hand sanitizer.
Section 4007 – Suspension of Certain Aviation Excise Taxes –
Transportation by Air – The CARES Act provides an excise tax holiday during which the excise taxes generally imposed by IRC Sections 4261 and 4271, on the cost of personal airfare and air transportation of property, respectively, shall not be imposed or due. The holiday period begins after the Act’s enactment – i.e., passage by both chambers of Congress and signed by the president – and ends at a date “before January 1, 2021.” Under the Act, without later legislation specifying an earlier date, the holiday will continue through December 31, 2020.
Personal air travel is normally subject to an excise tax of seven and one half (7.5%) percent on the amount of air fare. An additional amount of three ($3.00) dollars per domestic segment is also due. For the air transportation of property, an excise tax of six and one quarter (6.25%) percent is normally due on amounts paid to the transporter.
Use of Kerosene in Aircraft for Commercial Aviation – The excise tax holiday also extends to the excise taxes imposed on the purchase/use of kerosene in an aircraft for commercial aviation – i.e., air transportation of persons or property, for hire. Under IRC Section 4081, the excise tax on kerosene is levied at the rate of four and three tenths ($0.043) cents per gallon for commercial aviation. IRC Section 4041(c) provides an identical rate for commercial aviation. For purposes of the excise tax on kerosene, the Act provides that during the excise tax holiday period its use for commercial aviation shall be treated as a nontaxable use under IRC Section 6427(1).
Delay of Certain Accounting Rules
Section 4013 – Temporary Relief from Troubled Debt Restructurings – The CARES Act permits a financial institution to suspend the requirements under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) for a loan modification related to the COVID-19 pandemic that would otherwise be categorized as a troubled debt restructuring and to suspend any determination of a loan modified as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic as being a troubled debt restructuring, including impairment for accounting purposes. Generally, a troubled debt restructuring occurs when a lender modifies a loan and grants concessions that it would not normally consider because of the debtor’s financial difficulties. In such a situation, US GAAP requires the lender to account for the impairment of the loan over time. The CARES Act, suspends those rules from March 1, 2020 through the earlier of December 31, 2020 or 60 days after the date the national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is terminated.
Section 4014 – Optional Temporary Relief from Current Expected Credit Losses – In an unprecedented move by Congress, the CARES Act would delay the implementation of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s current expected credit losses (“CECL”) standard (Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments) which was scheduled to take effect for any entity required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2019 (note that for smaller SEC filers and other entities the effective date was for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022. The CECL standard was created in response to the 2008 financial crisis and would require an institution that issues credit, e.g., banks, credit unions and holding companies filing under US GAAP, to estimate credit loss reserves over the lifetime of a loan as opposed to the current incurred losses standard. The CARES Act would delay implementation of the CECL standard until the later of December 31, 2020 or the state on which the national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is terminated.
Individual Income Tax Changes
Section 2201 – 2020 Recovery Rebates for Individuals – Section 2201 of the CARES Act amends the Internal Revenue Code to add a new section, IRC Section 6428. IRC Section 6428 creates a credit against an eligible individual’s 2020 income tax liability equal to the sum of $1,200 ($2,400 in the case of eligible individuals filing a joint return) plus a $500 credit for each qualifying dependent 16 years old or younger. That amount of the credit is phased out for single filers with an adjusted gross income (“AGI”) between $75,000 and $99,000, joint filers with an AGI between $150,000 and $198,000 and heads of household with an AGI between $112,500 and $146,500. An eligible individual includes every individual except a nonresident alien, a taxpayer who can be claimed on someone else’s return as a dependent, or an estate or trust.
The amount of an eligible individual’s credit is based on AGI reported on the individual’s 2019 income tax return, if already filed. If an eligible individual has not yet filed a 2019 return, the IRS will rely on information from the individual’s 2018 tax return or a Social Security Administration (Social Security Benefit Statement or Social Security Equivalent Benefit Statement) to determine eligibility.
The recovery rebate is technically a tax credit for the 2020 tax year that will be paid out, in advance, as soon as possible. The advance rebate amount will be later reconciled with the rebate based on 2020 income. This means that a taxpayer who receives a smaller advance rebate than they are eligible for based on 2020 income will receive the difference after filing a 2020 tax return, but overpayments of advance rebates due to higher income in 2020 will not be clawed back.
For the vast majority of Americans, no action is required to receive a rebate check. Payments are expected to be issued by the IRS through direct deposit and should be in an eligible recipient’s bank accounts within weeks. Individuals who have not previously provided direct deposit information to IRS may expect checks in the mail, which is likely to take longer. The IRS is expected to divert significant employee resources to administering this aspect of the CARES Act, with concomitant impact on other IRS services including audit and collection activity.
Section 2204 – Allowance of Partial Above-the-Line Deductions for Charitable Contributions – The CARES Act amends IRC 62 to create a new “above-the-line” charitable contribution deduction for “qualified contributions”. The Act defines “qualified contributions” as contributions of up to $300 cash in taxable years beginning in 2020 to charitable organizations other than most private foundations (other than certain private operating foundations and certain special types of private foundations), supporting organizations or donor advised funds. This above-the-line deduction applies to taxpayers who do not itemize deductions.
Section 2205 – Increased Charitable Contribution Limits for Individuals for 2020 Calendar Year – As noted above, Section 2205 of the CARES Act increases the cap on charitable contribution deductions for “qualified contributions” made by individuals. For individuals, the Act removes the percentage of adjusted gross income limitation and instead limits the deduction for charitable contributions to the individual’s adjusted gross income reduced by the amount of other charitable contributions allowed. This will benefit individuals who itemize deductions.
Implications
The CARES Act contains an unprecedented economic stimulus and the tax provisions are designed to facilitate getting cash to individuals and businesses as soon as possible. For certain self-employed individuals, e.g., sole proprietors and partners, previously taken tax positions or tax positions currently being evaluated may directly impact the amount of their potential Payroll Protection Program loan, including the amount eligible for forgiveness. Those taxpayers should re-evaluate those decisions in to take into account any potential impacts on the benefits offered by the Payroll Protection Program. In addition, taxpayers eligible for a Payroll Protection Program loan should carefully weigh the benefits of that program with the benefits of the employer retention tax credit and other tax changes contained in the CARES Act.
The CARES Act may also have substantial state and local tax implications, including the creation of additional refund opportunities related to previously filed returns or for 2019 returns that are currently being prepared. It is not clear at this time whether or to what extent states will conform to the provisions contained in the CARES Act. States like Louisiana, which use federal taxable income as a starting point for computing state taxable income, may be impacted by the CARES Act. In addition, taxpayers should consider that any amended federal returns filed as a result of the CARES Act may require the amendment of the related state tax returns.
It should also be noted that employers should review their employee benefits plans to determine whether the plans must be amended in light of the changes in the CARES Act. As noted above, a separate blog post containing a more detailed review of the employment tax and employee benefits changes is forthcoming.
For additional information, please contact the Kean Miller Tax Group: Jaye Calhoun at (504) 293-5936; Kevin Curry at (225) 382-3484; Jason Brown at (225) 389-3733; Angie Adolph at (225) 382-3437; J. Mark Miller at (318) 562-2701; Phyllis Sims at (225) 389-3717; Robert Schmidt at (225) 382-4621; or Willie Kolarik at (225) 382-3441.
DOL Issues Additional Leave FAQs
Overnight, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division posted additional answers to pressing questions regarding leave issues under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. These Q&As address a number of recurring employer questions.
Documentation. One of the topics addressed by the DOL includes required documentation to support the need for leave (which the employer will also need to support a claim for tax credits). For example, documentation of the need for leave under the expanded FMLA can include something such as a notice posted on a government, school, or daycare website, notice published in a newspaper, or an email from an employee or other official from a school, place of care, or childcare provider (Q&A 15). For paid sick leave under the Act, documentation of the need for leave would include a quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19 or documentation from a healthcare provider advising the employee to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19 (Q&A 16).
Intermittent Leave. Another important issue addressed in the Q&As is the use of intermittent leave under the Act. The DOL differentiated between intermittent leave while teleworking and intermittent leave while working at the usual worksite. While teleworking, the employer and employee may agree that paid sick leave and leave under the expanded FMLA be used intermittently (Q&A 20). Conversely, an employee may not take intermittent leave while working at the usual worksite if the need for leave is because of COVID-19-related exposures or care for those exposed to COVID-19 (e.g., the employee is subject to a quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19, the employee has been advised by a healthcare provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19, the employee is experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking medical diagnosis, the employee is caring for an individual who is either subject to a quarantine or isolation order related to COVID 19 or has been advised by a healthcare provider to quarantine due to concerns related to COVID 19, or the employee is experiencing similar conditions specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services). Unless the employee is teleworking, once the employee begins taking leave for these illness-related purposes, the employee must continue to take paid sick leave until the amount of leave has been exhausted or the employee is no longer experiencing the qualifying reason for taking paid sick leave. This limitation makes perfect sense, because the intent of the leave requirement is to provide paid sick leave as necessary to keep COVID-19 from spreading to others (Q&A 21). Of course, if the employee is able to telework, then the employer and employee can agree to intermittent leave as described above. Finally, an employee taking expanded FMLA leave may take intermittent leave due to the closing of a child’s school or place of care, if the employee is not teleworking, but only with the employer’s permission (Q&A 22).
Leave Entitlements and Reduced Hours. Regarding an employer’s closure and layoffs both before and after April 1, even if the employer indicates a desire to re-open at some time in the future, those impacted employees are not entitled to the leave provided under the Act (Q&As 23-27). If an employer reduces scheduled work hours, leave under the new Act cannot be used to offset the reduced hours because the employee is not prevented from working because of a qualifying reason for leave, notwithstanding the fact that the reduction in hours was somehow related to COVID-19 (Q&A 28).
Substitution. Finally, substitution of paid leave for traditional unpaid FMLA leave is something that is well-established under the FMLA (as it existed prior to the current crisis), including those situations where employees are receiving a reduced amount of pay pursuant to a disability benefit plan (see, e.g., 29 CFR 825.207(d)). Paid leave provided by the new Act may be less than what the employee would have received had the employee worked. In that case, an employer and employee may agree to apply other employer-provided paid leave to make up the difference. Thus, if an employee is receiving 2/3 of their normal pay, the employer and employee may agree that the employee may use pre-existing employer-paid leave to make up the additional 1/3 of the employee’s normal earnings so that the employee receives his or her full normal earnings (Q&As 31-32). However, employers should closely track and account for the amounts of leave provided under the Act (differentiating between leave under the Act and other paid leave) so that the employer can demonstrate compliance with the Act and claim the proper tax credits. Although an employer and employee may agree to the substitution described above, an employer may not require an employee to supplement the reduced pay provided for under the paid leave Act with paid leave the employee has available under the employer’s policies (Q&A 33).
If you have questions, please contact Kean Miller labor and employment attorneys, Brian R. Carnie (318.562.2652), Chelsea G. Caswell (225.382.3405), A. Edward Hardin, Jr. (225.382.3458), Scott D. Huffstetler (225.389.3747), Michael D. Lowe (318.562.2653), Zoe W. Vermeulen (504.620.3367), and David M. Whitaker (504.620.3358).
CMS Expands Medicare Telehealth Benefits During Public Health Emergency
CMS has expanded Medicare telehealth benefits on a temporary and emergency basis pursuant to the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act. Starting March 6, 2020, Medicare will pay for office, hospital, and other visits furnished via telehealth provided by doctors, nurse practitioners, clinical psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers. The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) is also allowing healthcare providers to reduce or waive cost-sharing for telehealth visits. Previously, telehealth benefits under Medicare were limited to when the patient was located in a designated rural area and went to a clinic, hospital, or certain other types of medical facilities for the service.
There are three categories of services that will be reimbursed by Medicare. The first category is telehealth. Telehealth visits are considered the same as an in-person visit and are paid at the same rate. Physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurse midwives, certified nurse anesthetists, clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, registered dietitians, and nutrition professionals may provide telehealth services if it is within the scope of practice of the professional as determined by state law. Medicare will pay for telehealth services furnished to a patient in a healthcare facility or in the patient’s home. Telehealth services are billed under HCPCS/CPT codes: 99201-99215 (office of other outpatient visits); G0425 –G0427 (telehealth consultations emergency department or initial inpatient); G0406-G0408 (follow-up inpatient telehealth consultations furnished to beneficiaries in hospitals or SNFs).
The second category is virtual check-ins, which involve a brief communication between patient and practitioners via synchronous discussion over a telephone or exchange of information through video or image. Virtual check-ins are only for patients with an established (or existing) relationship with a practitioner where the communication is not related to a medical visit within the previous 7 days and does not lead to a medical visit within the next 24 hours (or soonest appointment available). The patient must consent to receive virtual check-in services. However, unlike telehealth services, the Medicare coinsurance and deductible would apply. Virtual check-in services provided through telephone, audio/video, secure text messaging, email, or use of a patient portal are billed under HCPCS code G2012. Remote evaluation of recorded video and/or images submitted by an established patient (e.g., store and forward), including interpretation with follow-up with the patient within 24 business hours, not originating from a related e/m service provided within the previous 7 days nor leading to an e/m service or procedure within the next 24 hours or soonest available appointment can be billed as HCPCS code G2010.
E-Visits are the third category which are patient-initiated online evaluation and management conducted via a patient portal. E-Visit services may be billed using CPT codes 99421-99423 and HCPCS codes G2061-G2063, as applicable. The patient must verbally consent to receive virtual check-in services. The Medicare coinsurance and deductible would apply to these services.
At this time, telehealth claims will not require the “DR” condition code or “CR” modifier. However, there are three scenarios where modifiers are required on Medicare telehealth claims. First, when the telehealth service is furnished via asynchronous (store and forward) technology as part of a federal telemedicine demonstration project in Alaska and Hawaii, the GQ modifier is required. Second, when a telehealth service is billed under CAH Method II, the GT modifier is required. Third, when telehealth service is furnished for purposes of diagnosis and treatment of an acute stroke, the G0 modifier is required.
The expansion of telehealth benefits under Medicare is being made by CMS on a temporary and emergency basis under the 1135 waiver authority. Providers will need to be mindful of the termination of these expanded benefits at the conclusion of the COVID-19 nationwide public health emergency.
Offshore Marine Service Association’s (OMSA) Guidance on Personnel Transport During the COVID-19 Pandemic
On March 25, 2020, the Offshore Marine Service Association (OMSA) issued a memorandum providing guidance on the transport of potentially infected personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. The memorandum aims to guide the offshore service industry on using the appropriate standards and procedures prior to, during and after the transport of potentially infected personnel.
The transport of infected or potentially infected personnel can likely increase the crew’s exposure to COVID-19 which can result in placing the vessel and/or the vessel’s crew under quarantine for a period of no less than 14 days. To mitigate exposure prior to transportation, all stakeholders should assess risk and reach a consensus regarding all planned activities and protocols before executing any related operations. Further, relevant stakeholder Safety Management Systems (SMS) should be consulted to determine the safest means of performing any necessary activities and Management of Change (MOC) procedures should be applied appropriately. Finally, stakeholders should ensure that all arrangements, isolation measures, crew protective procedures, screening records and protocols are well documented.
Prior to embarking, the individual being transported should be accompanied from the point of origin by one or more assistants. All personnel participating in this operation, including assistants and vessel crew, should use appropriate medical PPE. In addition, vessel operators should consider providing guidance to personnel on how to properly don and remove PPE.
Once the individual is onboard, the same should be directly taken to the quarantine facility or designated area, and the assistants escorting the individual should leave the vessel immediately. The route(s) taken during the transfer should be disinfected, including any surfaces (e.g., paperwork, other materials) that may have been in contact with the individual as well as the assistants.
The individual should be isolated and restricted to a single cabin or area of the vessel. Precautions should be implemented to prevent airborne spread, including sealing off the cabin from connected spaces and creating negative air pressure. Further, cross connections in ventilation should be closed and the use of High-Efficiency Particulate Absorbing (HEPA) equipment, such as portable air filtration units, should be implemented. Contact between vessel personnel and potentially infected individuals should be kept at an absolute minimum. Quarantine should be maintained until the infected individual is removed from the vessel. Discontinuing quarantine precautions for any reason should only be made during emergency situations or in consultation with and approval of the CDC and U.S.C.G.
On arrival, the individual should be accompanied by one or more assistants, preferably assistants from a medical facility, transportation entity, or another entity rather than crewmembers. If necessary, the crewmembers participating in the operation should use appropriate PPE. Once the individual has disembarked, the route(s), surfaces, paperwork and other materials in contact with the individual as well as the assistants should be disinfected.
To ensure the safety of the vessel’s crew, crewmembers and other personnel onboard should be regularly screened and results/responses recorded. Screening questions should focus on COVID-19 symptoms, with particular attention to warning signs. If a crew member onboard begins to show symptoms of illness during transit, quarantine procedures should be implemented immediately. Records of regular screenings, temperature readings, specific symptoms, and any relevant medical information should be relayed to U.S.C.G. During transport, regular status reports should be provided to the U.S.C.G., including patient condition and vessel estimated time of arrival. Vessels that have visited a foreign port and are returning to a U.S. port are required to report to the CDC any illnesses or deaths among the vessel’s crewmembers.
The communication among stakeholders, including governmental agencies, is essential to secure the safety of the crewmembers as well as the commercial viability of the endeavor. Before considering the transport of potentially infected personnel, communication concerning the responsibility and liability during transport, financial responsibility of vessel during a potential downtime of the vessel and/or quarantine, and the financial responsibility surrounding any disinfecting activities should be taken into consideration.
If you have questions, please contact Chuck Talley at 504-585-3046
***********************************************************
For more information:
“Interim Guidance for Ships” from CDC
“List N: Disinfectants for Use Against SARS-CoV-2” from EPA
Families First Coronavirus Response Act: The Model Notices Are Here
Yesterday afternoon, on March 25, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division issued its model notices that meet the requirements of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). The DOL provided a model notice for private sector employees and for public employees. All employers covered by the paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave provisions of the FFCRA are required to post the notice in a conspicuous place at work.
In addition to the model notices, yesterday the DOL also provided guidance regarding the posters, in the form of a Frequently Asked Questions document, which can be found here. Of note, the DOL addressed dissemination of the notice to employees currently teleworking and explained that the notice-posting requirement may be satisfied by emailing or direct mailing the notice to employees or posting the notice on the company intranet or external website.
The DOL was under a tight deadline to issue the notices. Therefore, it is possible that the notices may be fine-tuned between now and the Act’s effective date: April 1. Employers should continue to check the Wage and Hour Division’s website to ensure they remain current with all notice requirements.
If you have questions, please contact Kean Miller labor and employment attorneys, Brian R. Carnie (318.562.2652), Chelsea G. Caswell (225.382.3405), A. Edward Hardin, Jr. (225.382.3458), Scott D. Huffstetler (225.389.3747), Michael D. Lowe (318.562.2653), Zoe W. Vermeulen (504.620.3367), and David M. Whitaker (504.620.3358).
Leave Act Takes Effect April 1 and Other New DOL Guidance
Late Tuesday afternoon, March 24, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division issued guidance in the form of 14 questions and answers on the new COVID-19 leave act. Here is the link to the latest guidance. Some of the highlights are described below.
Although practitioners and commentators uniformly agreed that the act would take effect April 2, 2020, the DOL Q&As state that the “paid provisions are effective on April 1, 2020.” The DOL confirmed that the act sunsets December 31, 2020. Employers should make note.
The Q&As also address the issue of how to count employees for purposes of determining the 500-employee threshold. Regarding the counting of employees of related companies, the DOL stated:
“Typically, a corporation (including its separate establishments or divisions) is considered to be a single employer and its employees must each be counted towards the 500-employee threshold. Where a corporation has an ownership interest in another corporation, the two corporations are separate employers unless they are joint employers under the FLSA with respect to certain employees. If two entities are found to be joint employers, all of their common employees must be counted in determining whether paid sick leave must be provided under the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act and expanded family and medical leave must be provided under the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act.
In general, two or more entities are separate employers unless they meet the integrated employer test under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA). If two entities are an integrated employer under the FMLA, then employees of all entities making up the integrated employer will be counted in determining employer coverage for purposes of expanded family and medical leave under the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act.”
Another common question is how employers with 50 or fewer employees can qualify for the small business exception if providing the expanded leave would jeopardize the viability of the business as a going concern. The DOL advised that employers should document why the business meets this criteria but should not provide any documentation to the DOL at this time because more details regarding the criteria for this exemption will be included in the forthcoming regulations.
Finally, the DOL clarified that the new paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave requirements are not retroactive.
If you have questions, please contact Kean Miller labor and employment attorneys, Brian R. Carnie (318.562.2652), Chelsea G. Caswell (225.382.3405), A. Edward Hardin, Jr. (225.382.3458), Scott D. Huffstetler (225.389.3747), Michael D. Lowe (318.562.2653), Zoe W. Vermeulen (504.620.3367), and David M. Whitaker (504.620.3358).
HIPAA Privacy Rule Regulatory Response to COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic is reshaping many areas of law and regulation as businesses grapple with maintaining compliance, while also responding to the fluid needs of their clients and employees. In an effort to ease the regulatory burden on businesses, certain government agencies have made announcements that their offices will exercise discretion or waive certain noncompliance penalties that were done specifically to act responsibly in COVID-19’s wake. In particular, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) issued two bulletins regarding COVID-19 response.
The first, on March 16th, issued a limited waiver of HIPAA sanctions and penalties for violations of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Specifically, sanctions and penalties are waived for covered hospitals that do not comply with the HIPAA Privacy Rule’s requirements to: (i) obtain patient consent before speaking with family members or friends involved with case; (ii) honor requests to opt out of facility directory; (iii) distribute Notices of Privacy Practices; (iv) provide for the patient’s right to request privacy restrictions; and (v) provide for the patient’s right to request privacy. At present, the waiver only applies hospitals that have instituted a disaster protocol that are in the emergency area for up to 72 hours from the time the hospital institutes the disaster protocol. A copy of the bulletin may be found here.
The second bulletin was released on March 17th. This bulletin issued a Notification of Enforcement Discretion, waiving penalties during the COVID-19 national emergency for the good faith use of telehealth that may fall short of the HIPAA Privacy Rule Requirements. Here the OCR specifically permitted the use of video-chat applications on a health care provider’s phone or computer, using technology like Apple FaceTime, Skype, Google Hangouts, and similar technology in the course of providing telehealth. This waiver applies to all treatment by telehealth—not just the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. The bulletin did specifically caution against using Facebook Live, Twitch, TikTok,and similar public-facing video communication and encouraged providers to notify patients about potential privacy risks associated with third party applications. The OCR further stated that it would not penalize covered health care providers for the lack of a business associate agreement with video communication vendors. The OCR notice included a list of vendors to consider for providing telehealth including Skype for Business/Microsoft Teams, Updox, VSee, Zoom for Healthcare, Doxy.me, and Google G Suite Hangout Meet, but did not necessarily endorse the use of the vendors. Rather, the referral was based on the OCR’s believe that those vendors would enter into a business associate agreement. A copy of the bulletin may be found here.
While this waiver in some ways increases patient data breach risk, it does make the availability of telehealth more wide spread. Such a movement will instantly help expand health care provider’s ability to see patients virtually while responding in person to greater challenges.