Skip to content

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContact
Kean Miller LLP logo

Louisiana Law Blog

Insight and Information on Louisiana Law, Litigation, and Legal Culture

Brought to you by Kean Miller counsel who serve the legal needs of local, regional, and national companies.
Home » Choice of Law Provisions: Cheap Insurance Against the Unpredictable

Choice of Law Provisions: Cheap Insurance Against the Unpredictable

By Kean Miller on December 16, 2015
Posted in Admiralty and Maritime

crew boat

Choice-of-law provisions can be simple, single-sentence contract clauses that provide some certainty to disputes that may arise out of a contractual relationship. One such way that these clauses enhance the predictability of disputes is by limiting the remedies available to the parties to the contract to those available under the chosen law. This can be particularly useful when the work contemplated by a contract may occur in multiple states or on the waters adjacent to multiple states. A recent decision by the Eastern District of Louisiana in Cheramie Marine, LLC v. Freedom Well Services, LLC, 2015 WL 7306438 (E.D. La. 11/19/15) highlights the simplicity and usefulness of choice-of-law provisions in resolving disputes, and limiting exposure to damages.

The facts before the court in Cheramie Marine were all too common in our current energy climate: Cheramie Marine had provided a vessel under charter to Freedom Well who became unable to pay for the services of the vessel. After unsuccessfully attempting to recover the amounts owed through negotiations, Cheramie filed suit. But, in its suit Cheramie Marine sought recovery of not only the principal sum, but also attorneys’ fees under Louisiana’s Open Account Statute and civil penalties under Louisiana’s Misapplication of Payments Statute. Under the Louisiana Open Account Statute, a party is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in pursuit of a debt, and under the Misapplication of Payments Statute, civil penalties in an amount up to the amount of the underlying debt can be awarded against the debtor party. And while Freedom Well did not dispute that it owed Cheramie Marine for the services of its vessel, Cheramie Marine’s additional claims – if legally available – could have easily doubled the amount of any judgment rendered against Freedom Well. Accordingly, Freedom Well disputed Cheramie Marine’s ability to recover these additional items of damages.

Freedom Well’s primary argument relied on a simple choice-of-law provision in the charter agreement executed by Cheramie Marine and Freedom Well: “The Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with General Maritime Law . . . .” And because these additional damages sought by Cheramie Marine were provided for by Louisiana statutory law, they could not be recovered in an action governed by General Maritime Law. The Court found that the choice-of-law provision was valid, and therefore, Cheramie Marine’s suit was governed by general maritime law. On this foundation, the Court was then able to rely on precedent from the Fifth Circuit denying the recovery of attorneys’ fees under state statutes in actions governed by general maritime law. In considering Cheramie Marine’s claim for civil penalties, the Court stated that Cheramie Marine had provided it with “no case in which a court allowed for the recovery of civil penalties under Louisiana’s Misapplication of Payments Statute for failure to pay pursuant to a maritime contract governed by the general maritime law.” Accordingly, the Court denied Cheramie Marine’s request for civil penalties as well.

While the case of Cheramie Marine, LLC v. Freedom Well Services, LLC represents a very simple application of a choice-of-law provision, it is important to note that the simplicity, and swift resolution of the case is partly a result of the existence of the choice-of-law provision. While a similar result may still have been achieved at a later date, the cost to get to that result would have been much greater for both parties. Furthermore, should the Court have found that the dispute was governed by some law other than general maritime law, Freedom Well may have been subject to substantial fees and penalties that it did not bargain for when it entered into the charter agreement. Cheramie Marine, LLC v. Freedom Well Services, LLC therefore stands as an effective demonstration of the predictability that can be added to the resolution of contractual disputes by the inclusion of a simple choice-of-law provision.

 

Tags: Cheramie Marine, Choice of Law provisions, choice-of-law, LLC, LLC v. Freedom Well Services, Louisiana, Misapplication of Payments Statutes, Open Account Statute
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
Minime's Galerie, La Rochelle, France.
Choice-of-Law Clauses in Marine Insurance Policies: The U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert
March 21, 2023
Pilot ship
19th JDC Reverses Louisiana Pilotage Fee Commission Rate Increases
February 15, 2023
nicholas-doherty-pONBhDyOFoM-unsplash
CBP Affirms Jones Act (Coastwise) Compliant Vessels Are Required for Most Wind Energy Offshore Installations
September 30, 2022

ABOUT THIS BLOG

At Kean Miller, we deliver more than words.  We provide meaningful counsel you can count on.

Read More

Blog Authors Show/Hide

  • Alan J. Berteau
  • Adrienne Wood
  • Alexandra Rossi
  • Allison Benoit
  • Amanda Bourgeois
  • Amanda Collura-Day
  • Amanda Lowe
  • Ambrose Stearns
  • Angela Adolph
  • Beau Bourgeois
  • Ben Jumonville
  • Benn Vincent
  • Bill Caughman
  • Bill Ogden
  • Blane Clark
  • Bob Hawthorne
  • Brad Schlotterer
  • Brian Carnie
  • Brian Lindsey
  • Carrie Tournillon
  • Charles McCowan
  • Chauvin Kean
  • Chelsea Caswell
  • Chuck Talley
  • Claire Juneau
  • Claire Zeringue
  • Kean Miller
  • Crystal Burkhalter
  • Daniel Bosch
  • David Judd
  • David Halpern
  • David Whitaker
  • Dean Cazenave
  • Devin Ricci
  • Divya Jeswant
  • Donald Ethridge
  • Dorothy Thomas
  • Dwayne Johnson
  • Edward Hardin
  • Erich Rapp
  • Eric Lockridge
  • Erin Kilgore
  • Esteban Herrera
  • Forrest Guedry
  • Gary Alfred
  • Gayla Moncla
  • Georgia Ainsworth
  • Glenn Farnet
  • Glenn Orgeron
  • Greg Anding
  • Gwen Harmon
  • Hannah Colvin
  • James Hall
  • James Silverstein
  • Jason Cashio
  • Jaye Calhoun
  • Jay Jalenak
  • Jeffrey Boudreaux
  • Jennifer Thomas
  • Jessica Engler
  • Jill Gautreaux
  • John Funderburk
  • John Heinrich
  • John Jakuback
  • Judith Meyer
  • Julie Silbert
  • Karen Fontana Young
  • Karen Shipman
  • Karli Johnson
  • Katherine King
  • Katie Bell
  • Katilyn Hollowell
  • Kayla Bourgeois
  • Kevin Curry
  • Kimberly Hymel
  • Kyle Polozola
  • Lana Crump
  • Lauren Guichard
  • Lauren Rucinski
  • Leonard Kilgore
  • Linda Akchin
  • Linda Broocks
  • Linda Clark
  • Linda Rodrigue
  • Louis Grossman
  • Mack Gregorie
  • Mallory Fuller
  • Mark Doré
  • Mark Marionneaux
  • Mark Mese
  • J. Mark Miller
  • Mary Love
  • Mary Katherine Loos
  • Matthew Meiners
  • Matthew Smith
  • Maureen Harbourt
  • Meaghan Donovan
  • Melissa Cresson
  • Melissa Hemmans
  • Michael deBarros
  • Michael Lowe
  • Michael McGlone
  • Michael Phillips
  • Nathan Smith
  • Pamela Mascari
  • Patrick Roquemore
  • Phyllis Sims
  • Rachel Scarafia
  • Randy Cangelosi
  • J. Randy Young
  • Richard McConnell
  • Richard Pabst
  • Robert Kallam
  • Robert Schmidt
  • Ross Roubion
  • Russel Primeaux
  • Steven Boutwell
  • Scott Huffstetler
  • Scott Zimmer
  • Sean McLaughlin
  • Shane Sandefer
  • Shannan Rieger
  • Shearil Matthews
  • Sonny Chastain
  • Stephen Hanemann
  • Susan Lewis
  • Taylor Ashworth
  • Terry McCay
  • Tim Robinson
  • Todd Rossi
  • Tod Everage
  • Trey McCowan
  • Trippe Hawthorne
  • Troy Charpentier
  • Tyler Kostal
  • Vance Gibbs
  • Vicki Elmer
  • Victor Gregoire
  • Victor Suane
  • William Huguet
  • William Kolarik
  • Yuxian Wang
  • Zoe Vermeulen

STAY CONNECTED

RSS LinkedIn Facebook

TOPICS

ARCHIVES


RECENT UPDATES

  • Case on Fishing Boat Monitors Could Upend Forty Years of Chevron Deference
  • No Free Use in the Purple Rain – U.S. Supreme Court Finds License of Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” Infringes Photographer’s Copyright
  • Executory Process Foreclosure on Real Estate in Louisiana
  • Legal Issues with Using AI to Create Content – Written with Help from AI
  • Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law

Louisiana Law Blog

The publisher of this Web Blog is:
Erin L. Kilgore, Attorney at Law
PO Box 3513
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821
Phone: (225) 387-0999    
RSS LinkedIn Facebook

About the Firm

Kean Miller is counsel to the people and industries that drive the regional economy. From Fortune 1000 companies to local and regional businesses, we provide efficient and effective legal counsel in a cost-efficient manner. In the courtroom and the boardroom, Kean Miller attorneys create unique solutions, provide practical strategies, and deliver unparalleled value that allows our clients to perform at the highest level. Learn more.

Privacy PolicyDisclaimer
Copyright ©2023, Kean Miller LLP All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo